The Annual Newsletter of the International Reading Association's Phonics Special Interest Group

The Phonics Bulletin 2003 (complete PDF version)  

Tools for Teacher Preparation Programs in Reading Instruction
by Beth Ann Bader-Paetschow
California State University, Bakersfield

Introduction
As a teacher educator on a California State University campus, this researcher works closely with credential candidates with diverse backgrounds and varying levels of proficiency in understanding how the English language works. Many students are themselves endeavoring to attain a basic competency level in their understanding of phonics generalizations, the phoneme grapheme correspondences, and the conventions of writing since their prior formal educational backgrounds have not enabled them to develop and refine this knowledge base. In addition, these students are required to demonstrate an understanding of the reading acquisition process as well as systematic, effective, research-based reading methodology and instructional practices that will empower them to teach reading to children and adolescents.

Utilizing a systematic word study program, such as Ganske's Developmental Spelling Stage and Word Knowledge Model, with the synthetic phonics instructional training of the Spalding Method at the multiple subjects credential phase in university training is particularly effective for teachers-in-training, especially those who have limited backgrounds in English phonic generalizations (Ganske, 2000; Spalding, 1990). The Spalding Method includes a synthetic phonics component that combines use of the four sensory channels of hearing, seeing, speaking, and writing to teach the 70 phonograms and 29 spelling rules (Farnham-Diggory, 1990; Spalding, 1990; Spalding & North, 2003).

In the Spalding Method, the phonograms are the 70 single and multi-letter combinations that represent the 45 common phonemes. The phonograms and phonic generalizations are taught through the teacher's dictation of the Ayres Word List that students enter into their spelling notebooks. This priority word list contains many of the most commonly used words in the English language as well as carefully chosen compounds, contractions, nyms, base words, and derivations (Spalding, 1990). Correct pronunciation, precise writing, spelling, reading, vocabulary development, comprehension, and composition are outcomes of the students' use and mastery of the words in the Ayres Word List at an application level in reading and writing activities.

As words are entered and marked by the students in their spelling notebooks, which are similar to word study notebooks, students apply the phonic generalizations to specific words so that these guidelines and patterns of sound, symbol, and meaning can be assimilated. Since phonemic awareness practice is a necessary component of this synthetic phonics program, it is closely integrated with the spelling dictation exercises and is engaged in during dictation exercises.

The K-GAPAT and Phonological Awareness Study
The Kindergarten Group-Administered Phonological Awareness Test, or
K-GAPAT, was initially developed for use in large kindergarten classrooms as a coarse screening tool to assess children having difficulty with rhyming, initial sound discrimination, blending, segmenting, and dropping of the initial phoneme(s) on picture word item sets (Bader-Paetschow, 2000). The K-GAPAT was not utilized in a university classroom to help credential candidates understand the phonological awareness tasks until the summer of 2003.

The K-GAPAT enabled the credential candidates to assess their case study target and tutor children in the fieldwork component of the course. The K-GAPATwith its accompanying picture format offered children a picture of the spoken word and served as a scaffold for English Language Learners who might not have knowledge or understanding of the English words spoken on the original test. The pictures were an excellent aid for those children who had lexicon retrieval or short-term memory retention problems that would interfere with the children carrying out the strictly phonological component of the task.

Although these pictures provided clues to the correct answer for the task, they also served as comprehensible input for English Learners. The adult student could orally administer item sets without the child seeing the pictures in order to determine if the child could carry out the task without the picture scaffolds, utilizing auditory input alone. On subtests such as the rhyme and initial phoneme discrimination, the adult student could ask the target child to provide a word that would correctly answer the prompt. The nature of the task as a rhyme or initial phoneme discrimination recognition task would then become a rhyme or initial phoneme discrimination production task. Used this way, the K-GAPAT became a springboard for alternative ways that the adult student could assess the target child's phonological task proficiency.

Adult students exhibit characteristic learning styles and may need the same supports as adult learners that they needed as young learners. Many credential candidates shared that they were visual learners and needed the support of a visual in order to understand or retain concept material. The actual K-GAPAT instrument itself proved to be of use to these individuals since it provided them with a concrete, tangible example of what a phonological awareness test structure looks like and how it is administered. The visual and kinesthetic aspects of the K-GAPAT enhanced concept acquisition and retention, particularly for adult students who needed visual and kinesthetic experience in their own interactions with new concepts and materials.

The Phonograms, Phonic Generalizations, and Word Study
Many of the researcher's students had not been taught to read through a phonics approach and had limited or faulty understanding of the English phoneme and grapheme correspondences as well as the pronunciation and spelling guidelines that operated on both common and uncommon English words. The researcher introduced the 70 English phonograms, the Sweet Sixteen Phonics Generalizations, and a priority word list to her students (Spalding,1990). Using word sorts as an opportunity to apply the 16 phonic generalizations studied in the course, the researcher combined two compatible English language instruction partners by melding word study and a synthetic phonics program (Ganske, 2000; Spalding, 1990). All adult students found the phonograms and word sorts to be effective vehicles to transport them around the circuitous twists and turns of the many-layered English language. The often confusing orthographic patterns and variable pronunciations of words were more clearly organized and made sense to students utilizing the phonograms, phonic generalizations, and word sorts. Enchanting and attractive phonogram card sets and word sorts were created by the adult students and used in their tutoring fieldwork. The K-GAPAT, phonogram cards, and word sorts were useful instructional tools for these credential candidates. This marriage of methods has been successfully carried out with adult learners in a university classroom where these future teachers are participating in a reading acquisition process that they will be teaching their young students in the near future.

References


Bader-Paetschow, B. (2000). The kindergarten group-administered phonological awareness tests as phonemic task proficiency measures.
Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Arizona State University.

Ganske, K. (2000). Word journeys. New York: The Guilford Press.

Spalding R.B. (1990) The writing road to reading. New York: HarperCollins Publishers.

Spalding, R.B., & North, M.E. (Ed.). (2003). The writing road to reading: The Spalding Method for teaching speech, spelling, writing, and reading. New York: Harper Collins Publishers.

 

  Take a Phonics Quiz!
The Phonics Bulletin 2004 (complete RTF version)
Join the Phonics Special Interest group
Join the "WeLovePhonics" email group
Join the Phonics Bulletin Panel of Readers  
Articles  
Reviews of phonics books and instructional materials Ask a phonics question
Future meetings
Who's Who in our organization
Links  
Submit an article or review  
Submit a biography or Who's Who update Download the Phonics Bulletin
Call for proposals
Officers and elections  
Research references  

Join the International Reading Association

Definition of a "phonicator"
Previous issues  
Phonics SIG News